7.8

CVE-2026-53024

greybus: raw: fix use-after-free if write is called after disconnect

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

greybus: raw: fix use-after-free if write is called after disconnect

If a user writes to the chardev after disconnect has been called, the
kernel panics with the following trace (with
CONFIG_INIT_ON_FREE_DEFAULT_ON=y):

        BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000218
         ...
        Call Trace:
         <TASK>
         gb_operation_create_common+0x61/0x180
         gb_operation_create_flags+0x28/0xa0
         gb_operation_sync_timeout+0x6f/0x100
         raw_write+0x7b/0xc7 [gb_raw]
         vfs_write+0xcf/0x420
         ? task_mm_cid_work+0x136/0x220
         ksys_write+0x63/0xe0
         do_syscall_64+0xa4/0x290
         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

Disconnect calls gb_connection_destroy, which ends up freeing the
connection object. When gb_operation_sync is called in the write file
operations, its gets a freed connection as parameter and the kernel
panics.

The gb_connection_destroy cannot be moved out of the disconnect
function, as the Greybus subsystem expect all connections belonging to a
bundle to be destroyed when disconnect returns.

To prevent this bug, use a rw lock to synchronize access between write
and disconnect. This guarantees that the write function doesn't try
to use a disconnected connection.
Daten sind bereitgestellt durch National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
LinuxLinux Kernel Version >= 4.9 < 7.0.10
VulnDex Vulnerability Enrichment
Diese Information steht angemeldeten Benutzern zur Verfügung. Login Login
Zu dieser CVE wurde keine Warnung gefunden.
EPSS Metriken
Typ Quelle Score Percentile
EPSS FIRST.org 0.13% 0.029
CVSS Metriken
Quelle Base Score Exploit Score Impact Score Vector String
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 7.8 1.8 5.9
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CWE-416 Use After Free

The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory "belongs" to the code that operates on the new pointer.

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/48d6c32bc049abd114e8f0836c0e7d7cbfba7827
Patch
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/84265cbd96b97058ef67e3f8be3933667a000835
Patch