CVE-2026-98398

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

locking/lockdep: Invalidate stale class_cache entries for zapped classes

syzbot reported a lockdep splat hitting DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(1) in
hlock_class() due to an invalid class_idx:

  WARNING: kernel/locking/lockdep.c:238 at __lock_acquire+0x382/0x2cf0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5203
  Workqueue: wg-crypt-wg0 wg_packet_tx_worker
  RIP: 0010:hlock_class kernel/locking/lockdep.c:238 [inline]
  RIP: 0010:check_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4870 [inline]
  RIP: 0010:__lock_acquire+0x389/0x2cf0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5203
  Call Trace:
   <IRQ>
   lock_acquire+0x106/0x350 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5886
   _raw_spin_lock+0x2e/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:173
   tcp_tsq_handler+0x29/0x200 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1291
   tcp_tsq_workfn+0x384/0x410 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1325
   ...

When a lock class is zapped (e.g. during module unload or key
unregistration), zap_class() clears the class's bit in
lock_classes_in_use and removes it from the class hash table.
However, existing lockdep_map instances embedded in data structures
may still retain a pointer to the zapped class in their class_cache[]
array.

When __lock_acquire() subsequently runs on such a lock, it finds
lock->class_cache[subclass] != NULL, skipping register_lock_class()
and assigning hlock->class_idx to the index of the zapped class. When
check_wait_context() or hlock_class() inspects the held_lock, it finds
!test_bit(class_idx, lock_classes_in_use) and warns. Furthermore, if
the zapped slot is subsequently re-allocated to an unrelated lock key,
the stale class_cache entry would erroneously match the unrelated
class (ABA issue).

Add lock_class_cache_is_valid() to validate that the cached class is
within lock_classes bounds, still allocated in lock_classes_in_use
(using uninstrumented arch_test_bit() in __always_inline context so it
is safe in noinstr contexts like match_held_lock()), and that
class->key matches the expected subkey (taking lockdep_set_subclass()
overrides into account). Also use READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() when
accessing class_cache[].  If the entry is invalid or stale, fall back
to register_lock_class() / look_up_lock_class().