7.5
CVE-2026-68968
- EPSS 0.42%
- Veröffentlicht 12.08.2026 15:27:46
- Zuletzt bearbeitet 13.08.2026 14:13:41
- CVE-Watchlists
- Unerledigt
Apache Airflow: Authorization bypass in the Backfill API through conflicting interpretations of the backfill id
Apache Airflow's Backfill API authorized a request against a Dag id supplied by the caller whenever the `backfill_id` path segment failed to parse. The authorization dependency parsed it with `int()` while the route handler parsed it as pydantic's `NonNegativeInt`, which accepts values `int()` rejects (`1.0` coerces to `1`); FastAPI resolves dependencies before endpoint validation, so the two acted on different Dags. An authenticated user holding edit permission on any single Dag could therefore read, pause and cancel backfills belonging to any other Dag, including moving another Dag's queued runs to `failed`. No non-default configuration is required and backfill ids are sequential, so finding a target is trivial. Users are advised to upgrade to apache-airflow 3.3.1 or later, which parses the backfill id with the same type the routes declare.
| Typ | Quelle | Score | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|
| EPSS | FIRST.org | 0.42% | 0.346 |
| Quelle | Base Score | Exploit Score | Impact Score | Vector String |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CISA-ADP | 7.5 | 3.9 | 3.6 |
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
|
CWE-436 Interpretation Conflict
Product A handles inputs or steps differently than Product B, which causes A to perform incorrect actions based on its perception of B's state.
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/70889
https://lists.apache.org/thread/f9zmw6xs5b4syhwzbl6fsxm4kf2632ol
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/08/12/12