7.8
CVE-2026-43303
- EPSS 0.01%
- Veröffentlicht 08.05.2026 13:11:23
- Zuletzt bearbeitet 15.05.2026 13:27:39
- Quelle 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081f
- CVE-Watchlists
- Unerledigt
mm/page_alloc: clear page->private in free_pages_prepare()
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/page_alloc: clear page->private in free_pages_prepare() Several subsystems (slub, shmem, ttm, etc.) use page->private but don't clear it before freeing pages. When these pages are later allocated as high-order pages and split via split_page(), tail pages retain stale page->private values. This causes a use-after-free in the swap subsystem. The swap code uses page->private to track swap count continuations, assuming freshly allocated pages have page->private == 0. When stale values are present, swap_count_continued() incorrectly assumes the continuation list is valid and iterates over uninitialized page->lru containing LIST_POISON values, causing a crash: KASAN: maybe wild-memory-access in range [0xdead000000000100-0xdead000000000107] RIP: 0010:__do_sys_swapoff+0x1151/0x1860 Fix this by clearing page->private in free_pages_prepare(), ensuring all freed pages have clean state regardless of previous use.
Daten sind bereitgestellt durch National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version >= 5.18.1 < 6.18.16
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version >= 6.19 < 6.19.6
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version5.18 Update-
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version5.18 Updaterc4
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version5.18 Updaterc5
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version5.18 Updaterc6
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version5.18 Updaterc7
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version5.18 Updaterc9
VulnDex Vulnerability Enrichment
| Typ | Quelle | Score | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|
| EPSS | FIRST.org | 0.01% | 0.022 |
| Quelle | Base Score | Exploit Score | Impact Score | Vector String |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | 7.8 | 1.8 | 5.9 |
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
|
CWE-416 Use After Free
The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory "belongs" to the code that operates on the new pointer.