7.8
CVE-2026-43278
- EPSS 0.01%
- Veröffentlicht 06.05.2026 11:29:00
- Zuletzt bearbeitet 08.05.2026 19:38:24
- Quelle 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081f
- CVE-Watchlists
- Unerledigt
dm: clear cloned request bio pointer when last clone bio completes
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dm: clear cloned request bio pointer when last clone bio completes
Stale rq->bio values have been observed to cause double-initialization of
cloned bios in request-based device-mapper targets, leading to
use-after-free and double-free scenarios.
One such case occurs when using dm-multipath on top of a PCIe NVMe
namespace, where cloned request bios are freed during
blk_complete_request(), but rq->bio is left intact. Subsequent clone
teardown then attempts to free the same bios again via
blk_rq_unprep_clone().
The resulting double-free path looks like:
nvme_pci_complete_batch()
nvme_complete_batch()
blk_mq_end_request_batch()
blk_complete_request() // called on a DM clone request
bio_endio() // first free of all clone bios
...
rq->end_io() // end_clone_request()
dm_complete_request(tio->orig)
dm_softirq_done()
dm_done()
dm_end_request()
blk_rq_unprep_clone() // second free of clone bios
Fix this by clearing the clone request's bio pointer when the last cloned
bio completes, ensuring that later teardown paths do not attempt to free
already-released bios.Daten sind bereitgestellt durch National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version >= 6.1 < 6.1.165
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version >= 6.2 < 6.6.128
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version >= 6.7 < 6.12.75
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version >= 6.13 < 6.18.16
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version >= 6.19 < 6.19.6
VulnDex Vulnerability Enrichment
| Typ | Quelle | Score | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|
| EPSS | FIRST.org | 0.01% | 0.025 |
| Quelle | Base Score | Exploit Score | Impact Score | Vector String |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | 7.8 | 1.8 | 5.9 |
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
|
CWE-415 Double Free
The product calls free() twice on the same memory address, potentially leading to modification of unexpected memory locations.