7.8
CVE-2026-31454
- EPSS 0.01%
- Veröffentlicht 22.04.2026 14:16:39
- Zuletzt bearbeitet 06.05.2026 19:42:56
- Quelle 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081f
- CVE-Watchlists
- Unerledigt
xfs: save ailp before dropping the AIL lock in push callbacks
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfs: save ailp before dropping the AIL lock in push callbacks In xfs_inode_item_push() and xfs_qm_dquot_logitem_push(), the AIL lock is dropped to perform buffer IO. Once the cluster buffer no longer protects the log item from reclaim, the log item may be freed by background reclaim or the dquot shrinker. The subsequent spin_lock() call dereferences lip->li_ailp, which is a use-after-free. Fix this by saving the ailp pointer in a local variable while the AIL lock is held and the log item is guaranteed to be valid.
Daten sind bereitgestellt durch National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version >= 5.9 < 5.10.253
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version >= 5.11 < 5.15.203
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version >= 5.16 < 6.1.168
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version >= 6.2 < 6.6.131
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version >= 6.7 < 6.12.80
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version >= 6.13 < 6.18.21
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version >= 6.19 < 6.19.11
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version7.0 Updaterc1
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version7.0 Updaterc2
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version7.0 Updaterc3
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version7.0 Updaterc4
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version7.0 Updaterc5
VulnDex Vulnerability Enrichment
| Typ | Quelle | Score | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|
| EPSS | FIRST.org | 0.01% | 0.024 |
| Quelle | Base Score | Exploit Score | Impact Score | Vector String |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | 7.8 | 1.8 | 5.9 |
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
|
CWE-416 Use After Free
The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory "belongs" to the code that operates on the new pointer.