7.8

CVE-2025-37819

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

irqchip/gic-v2m: Prevent use after free of gicv2m_get_fwnode()

With ACPI in place, gicv2m_get_fwnode() is registered with the pci
subsystem as pci_msi_get_fwnode_cb(), which may get invoked at runtime
during a PCI host bridge probe. But, the call back is wrongly marked as
__init, causing it to be freed, while being registered with the PCI
subsystem and could trigger:

 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff8000816c0400
  gicv2m_get_fwnode+0x0/0x58 (P)
  pci_set_bus_msi_domain+0x74/0x88
  pci_register_host_bridge+0x194/0x548

This is easily reproducible on a Juno board with ACPI boot.

Retain the function for later use.
Verknüpft mit AI von unstrukturierten Daten zu bestehenden CPE der NVD
Diese Information steht angemeldeten Benutzern zur Verfügung. Login Login
Daten sind bereitgestellt durch National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version >= 4.5 < 5.4.294
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version >= 5.5 < 5.10.238
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version >= 5.11 < 5.15.182
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version >= 5.16 < 6.1.138
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version >= 6.2 < 6.6.89
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version >= 6.7 < 6.12.26
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version >= 6.13 < 6.14.5
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version6.15 Updaterc1
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version6.15 Updaterc2
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version6.15 Updaterc3
Debian ≫ Debian Linux Version11.0
Zu dieser CVE wurde keine CISA KEV oder CERT.AT-Warnung gefunden.
EPSS Metriken
Typ Quelle Score Percentile
EPSS FIRST.org 0.02% 0.051
CVSS Metriken
Quelle Base Score Exploit Score Impact Score Vector String
nvd@nist.gov 7.8 1.8 5.9
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CWE-416 Use After Free

The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory "belongs" to the code that operates on the new pointer.