6.5
CVE-2024-26886
- EPSS 0.02%
- Veröffentlicht 17.04.2024 11:15:10
- Zuletzt bearbeitet 21.03.2025 14:33:44
- Quelle 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081f
- CVE-Watchlists
- Unerledigt
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: af_bluetooth: Fix deadlock
Attemting to do sock_lock on .recvmsg may cause a deadlock as shown
bellow, so instead of using sock_sock this uses sk_receive_queue.lock
on bt_sock_ioctl to avoid the UAF:
INFO: task kworker/u9:1:121 blocked for more than 30 seconds.
Not tainted 6.7.6-lemon #183
Workqueue: hci0 hci_rx_work
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__schedule+0x37d/0xa00
schedule+0x32/0xe0
__lock_sock+0x68/0xa0
? __pfx_autoremove_wake_function+0x10/0x10
lock_sock_nested+0x43/0x50
l2cap_sock_recv_cb+0x21/0xa0
l2cap_recv_frame+0x55b/0x30a0
? psi_task_switch+0xeb/0x270
? finish_task_switch.isra.0+0x93/0x2a0
hci_rx_work+0x33a/0x3f0
process_one_work+0x13a/0x2f0
worker_thread+0x2f0/0x410
? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
kthread+0xe0/0x110
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
</TASK>Verknüpft mit AI von unstrukturierten Daten zu bestehenden CPE der NVD
Daten sind bereitgestellt durch National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version >= 5.10.206 < 5.11
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version >= 5.15.146 < 5.16
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version >= 6.1.70 < 6.1.83
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version >= 6.6.9 < 6.6.23
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version >= 6.7 < 6.7.11
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version >= 6.8 < 6.8.2
| Typ | Quelle | Score | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|
| EPSS | FIRST.org | 0.02% | 0.03 |
| Quelle | Base Score | Exploit Score | Impact Score | Vector String |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0 | 6.5 | 2.8 | 3.6 |
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
|
CWE-416 Use After Free
The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory "belongs" to the code that operates on the new pointer.