5.8
CVE-2024-20293
- EPSS 0.09%
- Veröffentlicht 22.05.2024 17:16:13
- Zuletzt bearbeitet 30.07.2025 19:06:02
- Quelle psirt@cisco.com
- Teams Watchlist Login
- Unerledigt Login
A vulnerability in the activation of an access control list (ACL) on Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass the protection that is offered by a configured ACL on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to a logic error that occurs when an ACL changes from inactive to active in the running configuration of an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending traffic through the affected device that should be denied by the configured ACL. The reverse condition is also true—traffic that should be permitted could be denied by the configured ACL. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass configured ACL protections on the affected device, allowing the attacker to access trusted networks that the device might be protecting. Note: This vulnerability applies to both IPv4 and IPv6 traffic as well as dual-stack ACL configurations in which both IPv4 and IPv6 ACLs are configured on an interface.
Verknüpft mit AI von unstrukturierten Daten zu bestehenden CPE der NVD
Diese Information steht angemeldeten Benutzern zur Verfügung. Login
Daten sind bereitgestellt durch National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
Cisco ≫ Adaptive Security Appliance Software Version >= 9.19.1 <= 9.19.1.24
Cisco ≫ Adaptive Security Appliance Software Version9.20.1
Cisco ≫ Adaptive Security Appliance Software Version9.20.1.5
Cisco ≫ Firepower Threat Defense Version >= 7.3.0 <= 7.4.0
Zu dieser CVE wurde keine CISA KEV oder CERT.AT-Warnung gefunden.
Typ | Quelle | Score | Percentile |
---|---|---|---|
EPSS | FIRST.org | 0.09% | 0.263 |
Quelle | Base Score | Exploit Score | Impact Score | Vector String |
---|---|---|---|---|
psirt@cisco.com | 5.8 | 3.9 | 1.4 |
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
|
CWE-436 Interpretation Conflict
Product A handles inputs or steps differently than Product B, which causes A to perform incorrect actions based on its perception of B's state.