5.5

CVE-2023-52566

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

nilfs2: fix potential use after free in nilfs_gccache_submit_read_data()

In nilfs_gccache_submit_read_data(), brelse(bh) is called to drop the
reference count of bh when the call to nilfs_dat_translate() fails.  If
the reference count hits 0 and its owner page gets unlocked, bh may be
freed.  However, bh->b_page is dereferenced to put the page after that,
which may result in a use-after-free bug.  This patch moves the release
operation after unlocking and putting the page.

NOTE: The function in question is only called in GC, and in combination
with current userland tools, address translation using DAT does not occur
in that function, so the code path that causes this issue will not be
executed.  However, it is possible to run that code path by intentionally
modifying the userland GC library or by calling the GC ioctl directly.

[konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com: NOTE added to the commit log]

Verknüpft mit AI von unstrukturierten Daten zu bestehenden CPE der NVD
This information is available to logged-in users.
Data is provided by the National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version >= 2.6.30 < 4.14.327
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version >= 4.15 < 4.19.296
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version >= 4.20 < 5.4.258
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version >= 5.5 < 5.10.198
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version >= 5.11 < 5.15.134
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version >= 5.16 < 6.1.56
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version >= 6.2 < 6.5.6
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version6.6 Updaterc1
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version6.6 Updaterc2
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version6.6 Updaterc3
Zu dieser CVE wurde keine CISA KEV oder CERT.AT-Warnung gefunden.
EPSS Metriken
Type Source Score Percentile
EPSS FIRST.org 0.01% 0.011
CVSS Metriken
Source Base Score Exploit Score Impact Score Vector string
134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0 5.5 1.8 3.6
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CWE-416 Use After Free

The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory "belongs" to the code that operates on the new pointer.