7.8

CVE-2023-51549

Foxit PDF Reader AcroForm Doc Object Use-After-Free Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PDF Reader. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file.

The specific flaw exists within the handling of Doc objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-21867.

Verknüpft mit AI von unstrukturierten Daten zu bestehenden CPE der NVD
Diese Information steht angemeldeten Benutzern zur Verfügung.
Daten sind bereitgestellt durch National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
Foxit ≫ Pdf Editor Version <= 10.1.12.37872
   Microsoft ≫ Windows Version-
Foxit ≫ Pdf Editor Version >= 11.0.0.49893 <= 11.2.7.53812
   Microsoft ≫ Windows Version-
Foxit ≫ Pdf Editor Version >= 12.0.0.12394 <= 12.1.3.15356
   Microsoft ≫ Windows Version-
Foxit ≫ Pdf Editor Version13.0.0.21632
   Microsoft ≫ Windows Version-
Foxit ≫ Pdf Editor Version2023.1.0.15510
   Microsoft ≫ Windows Version-
Foxit ≫ Pdf Editor Version2023.2.0.21408
   Microsoft ≫ Windows Version-
Foxit ≫ Pdf Reader Version <= 2023.2.0.21408
   Microsoft ≫ Windows Version-
Zu dieser CVE wurde keine CISA KEV oder CERT.AT-Warnung gefunden.
EPSS Metriken
Typ Quelle Score Percentile
EPSS FIRST.org 1.5% 0.805
CVSS Metriken
Quelle Base Score Exploit Score Impact Score Vector String
nvd@nist.gov 7.8 1.8 5.9
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
zdi-disclosures@trendmicro.com 7.8 1.8 5.9
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CWE-416 Use After Free

The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory "belongs" to the code that operates on the new pointer.