7.8
CVE-2022-48950
- EPSS 0.07%
- Veröffentlicht 21.10.2024 20:15:06
- Zuletzt bearbeitet 25.10.2024 20:02:03
- Quelle 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081f
- CVE-Watchlists
- Unerledigt
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: perf: Fix perf_pending_task() UaF Per syzbot it is possible for perf_pending_task() to run after the event is free()'d. There are two related but distinct cases: - the task_work was already queued before destroying the event; - destroying the event itself queues the task_work. The first cannot be solved using task_work_cancel() since perf_release() itself might be called from a task_work (____fput), which means the current->task_works list is already empty and task_work_cancel() won't be able to find the perf_pending_task() entry. The simplest alternative is extending the perf_event lifetime to cover the task_work. The second is just silly, queueing a task_work while you know the event is going away makes no sense and is easily avoided by re-arranging how the event is marked STATE_DEAD and ensuring it goes through STATE_OFF on the way down.
Daten sind bereitgestellt durch National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version < 5.15.84
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version >= 5.16 < 6.0.14
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version6.1 Updaterc1
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version6.1 Updaterc2
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version6.1 Updaterc3
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version6.1 Updaterc4
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version6.1 Updaterc5
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version6.1 Updaterc6
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version6.1 Updaterc7
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version6.1 Updaterc8
| Typ | Quelle | Score | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|
| EPSS | FIRST.org | 0.07% | 0.214 |
| Quelle | Base Score | Exploit Score | Impact Score | Vector String |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| nvd@nist.gov | 7.8 | 1.8 | 5.9 |
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
|
CWE-416 Use After Free
The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory "belongs" to the code that operates on the new pointer.