7
CVE-2025-39826
- EPSS 0.02%
- Veröffentlicht 16.09.2025 13:00:24
- Zuletzt bearbeitet 16.01.2026 20:36:13
- Quelle 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081f
- CVE-Watchlists
- Unerledigt
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: rose: convert 'use' field to refcount_t The 'use' field in struct rose_neigh is used as a reference counter but lacks atomicity. This can lead to race conditions where a rose_neigh structure is freed while still being referenced by other code paths. For example, when rose_neigh->use becomes zero during an ioctl operation via rose_rt_ioctl(), the structure may be removed while its timer is still active, potentially causing use-after-free issues. This patch changes the type of 'use' from unsigned short to refcount_t and updates all code paths to use rose_neigh_hold() and rose_neigh_put() which operate reference counts atomically.
Verknüpft mit AI von unstrukturierten Daten zu bestehenden CPE der NVD
Daten sind bereitgestellt durch National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version >= 2.6.12.1 < 6.1.150
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version >= 6.2 < 6.6.104
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version >= 6.7 < 6.12.45
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version >= 6.13 < 6.16.5
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version2.6.12 Update-
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version2.6.12 Updaterc2
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version2.6.12 Updaterc3
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version2.6.12 Updaterc4
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version2.6.12 Updaterc5
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version6.17 Updaterc1
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version6.17 Updaterc2
Linux ≫ Linux Kernel Version6.17 Updaterc3
Debian ≫ Debian Linux Version11.0
| Typ | Quelle | Score | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|
| EPSS | FIRST.org | 0.02% | 0.054 |
| Quelle | Base Score | Exploit Score | Impact Score | Vector String |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| nvd@nist.gov | 7 | 1 | 5.9 |
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
|
CWE-416 Use After Free
The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory "belongs" to the code that operates on the new pointer.