7

CVE-2025-39826

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: rose: convert 'use' field to refcount_t

The 'use' field in struct rose_neigh is used as a reference counter but
lacks atomicity. This can lead to race conditions where a rose_neigh
structure is freed while still being referenced by other code paths.

For example, when rose_neigh->use becomes zero during an ioctl operation
via rose_rt_ioctl(), the structure may be removed while its timer is
still active, potentially causing use-after-free issues.

This patch changes the type of 'use' from unsigned short to refcount_t and
updates all code paths to use rose_neigh_hold() and rose_neigh_put() which
operate reference counts atomically.
Verknüpft mit AI von unstrukturierten Daten zu bestehenden CPE der NVD
Diese Information steht angemeldeten Benutzern zur Verfügung. Login Login
Daten sind bereitgestellt durch National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
LinuxLinux Kernel Version >= 2.6.12.1 < 6.1.150
LinuxLinux Kernel Version >= 6.2 < 6.6.104
LinuxLinux Kernel Version >= 6.7 < 6.12.45
LinuxLinux Kernel Version >= 6.13 < 6.16.5
LinuxLinux Kernel Version2.6.12 Update-
LinuxLinux Kernel Version2.6.12 Updaterc2
LinuxLinux Kernel Version2.6.12 Updaterc3
LinuxLinux Kernel Version2.6.12 Updaterc4
LinuxLinux Kernel Version2.6.12 Updaterc5
LinuxLinux Kernel Version6.17 Updaterc1
LinuxLinux Kernel Version6.17 Updaterc2
LinuxLinux Kernel Version6.17 Updaterc3
DebianDebian Linux Version11.0
Zu dieser CVE wurde keine CISA KEV oder CERT.AT-Warnung gefunden.
EPSS Metriken
Typ Quelle Score Percentile
EPSS FIRST.org 0.02% 0.054
CVSS Metriken
Quelle Base Score Exploit Score Impact Score Vector String
nvd@nist.gov 7 1 5.9
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CWE-416 Use After Free

The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory "belongs" to the code that operates on the new pointer.