7.5

CVE-2025-12105

A flaw was found in the asynchronous message queue handling of the libsoup library, widely used by GNOME and WebKit-based applications to manage HTTP/2 communications. When network operations are aborted at specific timing intervals, an internal message queue item may be freed twice due to missing state synchronization. This leads to a use-after-free memory access, potentially crashing the affected application. Attackers could exploit this behavior remotely by triggering specific HTTP/2 read and cancel sequences, resulting in a denial-of-service condition.
Verknüpft mit AI von unstrukturierten Daten zu bestehenden CPE der NVD
Diese Information steht angemeldeten Benutzern zur Verfügung. Login Login
Daten sind bereitgestellt durch das CVE Programm von einer CVE Numbering Authority (CNA) (Unstrukturiert).
HerstellerGNOME
Produkt libsoup
Default Statusunaffected
Version <= 3.6.5
Version 0
Status affected
HerstellerRed Hat
Produkt Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
Default Statusaffected
Version < *
Version 0:3.6.5-3.el10_1.7
Status unaffected
HerstellerRed Hat
Produkt Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.0 Extended Update Support
Default Statusaffected
Version < *
Version 0:3.6.5-3.el10_0.10
Status unaffected
HerstellerRed Hat
Produkt Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Default Statusunknown
HerstellerRed Hat
Produkt Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Default Statusunaffected
HerstellerRed Hat
Produkt Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Default Statusunaffected
HerstellerRed Hat
Produkt Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
Default Statusunaffected
Zu dieser CVE wurde keine CISA KEV oder CERT.AT-Warnung gefunden.
EPSS Metriken
Typ Quelle Score Percentile
EPSS FIRST.org 0.06% 0.195
CVSS Metriken
Quelle Base Score Exploit Score Impact Score Vector String
secalert@redhat.com 7.5 3.9 3.6
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CWE-416 Use After Free

The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory "belongs" to the code that operates on the new pointer.