6.5
CVE-2023-5455
- EPSS 0.37%
- Published 10.01.2024 13:15:48
- Last modified 21.11.2024 08:41:47
- Source secalert@redhat.com
- Teams watchlist Login
- Open Login
A Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in ipa/session/login_password in all supported versions of IPA. This flaw allows an attacker to trick the user into submitting a request that could perform actions as the user, resulting in a loss of confidentiality and system integrity. During community penetration testing it was found that for certain HTTP end-points FreeIPA does not ensure CSRF protection. Due to implementation details one cannot use this flaw for reflection of a cookie representing already logged-in user. An attacker would always have to go through a new authentication attempt.
Data is provided by the National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
Fedoraproject ≫ Fedora Version38
Fedoraproject ≫ Fedora Version39
Fedoraproject ≫ Fedora Version40
Redhat ≫ Codeready Linux Builder Version-
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux Version7.0
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux Version8.0
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux Version8.0 HwPlatformarm64
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux Version8.4
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux Version9.0
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux Desktop Version7.0
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux Eus Version8.6
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux Eus Version8.6 HwPlatformarm64
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux Eus Version8.8
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux Eus Version9.0
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux Eus Version9.2
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux For Arm 64 Eus Version8.8
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux For Arm 64 Eus Version9.0
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux For Arm 64 Eus Version9.2
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux For Ibm Z Systems Version7.0
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux For Ibm Z Systems Version8.0
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux For Ibm Z Systems Version9.0
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux For Ibm Z Systems Eus Version8.6
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux For Ibm Z Systems Eus Version8.8
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux For Ibm Z Systems Eus Version9.0
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux For Ibm Z Systems Eus Version9.2
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux For Power Big Endian Version7.0
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux For Power Little Endian Version7.0
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux For Power Little Endian Version8.0
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux For Power Little Endian Version9.0
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux For Power Little Endian Eus Version8.6
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux For Power Little Endian Eus Version8.8
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux For Power Little Endian Eus Version9.0
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux For Power Little Endian Eus Version9.2
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux For Scientific Computing Version7.0
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux Server Version9.0 HwPlatformarm64
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux Server Version9.2 HwPlatformarm64
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux Server Aus Version8.2
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux Server Aus Version8.4
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux Server Aus Version8.6
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux Server Aus Version9.2
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux Server For Ibm Z Systems Version9.2
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux Server For Power Little Endian Update Services For Sap Solutions Version8.2
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux Server For Power Little Endian Update Services For Sap Solutions Version8.4
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux Server For Power Little Endian Update Services For Sap Solutions Version8.6
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux Server Tus Version8.2
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux Server Tus Version8.4
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux Server Tus Version8.6
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux Update Services For Sap Solutions Version9.0
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux Update Services For Sap Solutions Version9.2
Redhat ≫ Enterprise Linux Workstation Version7.0
Zu dieser CVE wurde keine CISA KEV oder CERT.AT-Warnung gefunden.
Type | Source | Score | Percentile |
---|---|---|---|
EPSS | FIRST.org | 0.37% | 0.579 |
Source | Base Score | Exploit Score | Impact Score | Vector string |
---|---|---|---|---|
nvd@nist.gov | 6.5 | 2.8 | 3.6 |
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
|
secalert@redhat.com | 6.5 | 2.8 | 3.6 |
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
|
CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request.